10/14/2026

    From Cyrus the Peacemaker to Xerxes the Warmonger: History in the Service of Politics

    The selective narratives of history—from Cyrus the Peacemaker to Xerxes the Warmonger—serve to construct identity and to define today's friends…
    09/05/2026

    Hegemonic Transition and the Reordering of the International Order: From Asheville to Bishkek

    The convergence of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit in Bishkek and the G20 finance meeting in Asheville underscored the widening…
    08/27/2026

    The “Arabian Gulf” and the Persian Gulf: From Historical Distortion to Playing With Fire

    Continued political efforts to replace the name “Persian Gulf” with “Arabian Gulf” run counter to historical evidence and established international…
    "Even if Republicans lose their majority in Congress, the wars will not necessarily end. after the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 and growing public dissatisfaction, Democrats won narrow majorities in both the House of Representatives and the Senate in November 2006. Nevertheless, George W. Bush not only refused to withdraw, but in 2007 implemented the troop “surge” strategy, sending roughly 20,000 additional troops to Iraq."

    Ken Loach Analyst

    "Netanyahu lost all three of his wars: He couldn't defeat Hamas, nor destroy Hezbollah in Lebanon, nor prevail against the Iran. Now an isolated regime with thousands of losses across all levels has outsmarted America, and its rabid dog is pleased with itself for carrying out a few assassinations. The Zionist regime has reached the end of the line."

    Abdolsamad Jafari Sociologist

    "Obama's words last night made things harder for Trump. Trump's thinking is that he can boost his popularity by reigniting the war, but Obama's words last night showed that from the Democrats' perspective, attacking Iran was pointless from the start, started on a baseless pretext, and is continuing pointlessly."

    Ehsan Taghadosi Analyst

    Back to top button